EMC Logo Early MusiChicago Discussion Forum

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Feb 28th, 2017, 10:43am
Early MusiChicago Home

EMC Logo
Home Home Help Help Search Search Members Members Login Login Register Register
Early MusiChicago Discussion Forum ę Post reply Ľ
   Early MusiChicago Discussion Forum
   Early Instruments & Voice
   Post reply ( Re: Kynseker Renaissance Sopranos )
Post reply
Full name:
Message icon:
Add YABBC tags:
Add Smileys:

Disable Smilies:

Check this if you'll be adding code (or don't like smileys).

shortcuts (IE and NS6 only): hit alt+s to send, alt+p to preview, or alt+r to reset

Topic Summary
Posted by: Labattaille Posted on: Feb 18th, 2004, 4:50pm
Hi all,
I've recently been considering purchasing a renaissance soprano recorder with my hoarded Christmas money (*rubs hands together in glee*). The Kynseker renaissance soprano models of both Moeck and Mollenhauer have intrigued me the most. Iíve read that theyíre both rather similar to one another. Though apparently the Moeck model claims to be the more versatile of the two, and perhaps more suited for solo play because of its strength in all registers, the Mollenhauer is possibly the better ensemble instrument. Iíve heard from Bill Lazar of Lazarís Early Music Shop that the Mollenhauer is just as good as the Moeck, and that there really isnít a difference between the playing quality of either.
Has someone out there ever tried a Moeck or Mollenhauer Kynsek Renaissance recorder or considered buying one? If so, what did you think of either of them and/or where did you purchase from? Iíd also love advice from anyone who owns a Renaissance recorder. What are the differences between its sound quality and say that of a Baroque recorder? What should I look for in terms of quality?

Early MusiChicago Discussion Forum » Powered by YaBB 1 Gold - SP 1.3.1!
YaBB © 2000-2003. All Rights Reserved.

Early MusiChicago Home